Tepom.com

Personal finance advice for the average American.

Friday, August 1, 2008

Topography on Microsoft Live Maps

I am sometimes torn between using Google Maps and Microsoft Live Maps. Each has at least one unique feature that keeps me coming back. For example, Google Maps' ability to change my route by dragging it to additional waypoints is useful and intelligent. But Microsoft Live Maps has much better Bird's Eye View shots and satellite-photo coverage of rural areas, particularly Cooperstown, NY where I grew up. But Live Maps just got my attention on a whole new level with their 3D topology function.

When using their web-based 3D Virtual Earth tool, I can 'travel' to anywhere in the world and change my view to get a 3D representation of the view from anywhere. My first trip was to my cousin Kyle's house in Cooperstown, at the bottom of the hill that we used to climb when we were kids -- and there it was. With a few more mouse clicks and with a little help from their search bar, I was getting the view of the Himalayas from the top of Mount Everest, seeing the same terrain as what Sir Edmund Hillary saw after scaling the mountain for the first time.

I decided to put the rendered topography to the test and see how accurate it really was. I compared a photo that I took in Glacier National Park to a screen shot of the 3D representation that is displayed on Virtual Earth. See for yourself!

This is a photo I took at the
Many Glacier Hotel in
Glacier National Park, Montana


This is Microsoft Virtual Earth's
3D representation of the same location

3D rendering has been around for a long time, but not with the convenience, speed, and apparent accuracy of Microsoft Virtual Earth. I envision this to improve over time, eventually to a point when we can play a game like Chuck Yeager's Air Combat (remember that one?) and have a photo-quality 3D picture of what our world looks like with terrain and buildings included.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

7 Comments:

  • At August 1, 2008 10:33 AM , Blogger Steve said...

    Since when are you such a Microsoft fanboy? :)

    I don't think you're really comparing apples and apples. You left out Google Earth. Comparing Live Maps and Google Maps is fair, but if you're going to bring MS Virtual Earth in, you gotta look at Google Earth. Both of the maps are browser based, both Earths require a local installation. Although Virtual Earth still runs through a browser and Google Earth runs in it's own window, both are streaming data over the internet in a very similar way.

    I've been trying to install Virtual Earth, but it won't run on my computer - maybe because I'm running 64-bit? I hope that's not why, MS made my OS so I would hope their programs would run on it. So, I can't compare the Earth programs directly. However, from what I've seen, Virtual Earth is pretty impressive. I looked around Glacier National Park on Google Earth and things looked pretty similar (although I didn't take the time to find your exact view) - maybe you can make the comparison. I don't know if Live Earth has the same overlays and user added content that Google Earth does - photographs, Wikipedia, NASA, restraunt reviews, roads, traffic, etc etc, there are hundreds. I imagine it has some.

    As far as the two fully browser based map programs, I think you're right about the rural satellite coverage. Live Maps seems a bit better. Again though, I have to give it to Google for speed (at least on my computer on my connection) and added content. Google's added content is cool - the directions are by far the best, street view is ridiculous and creepy, etc - but the user added content really helps put it over the top. Things like housingmaps.com and the plethora of other mashups and custom maps are awesome.

    I'll check Live Maps if I can't find a good view on Google Maps, but for now, I'll stick with the company with the stupid name. Besides, I've used enough MS products, it feels good to use other stuff.

     
  • At August 1, 2008 11:18 AM , Anonymous William M. Hartnett said...

    @steve: Virtual Earth 3D installed no problem for me in both Firefox and IE on Windows XP x64 (aka Windows Server 2003). Been using it relatively trouble-free for awhile now.

    Outdated imagery is one of my big complaints about Google Maps here in Southeast Florida. Street View coverage is cool, but I'd still like plain old ortho coverage that's not pushing four years old: http://is.gd/1bKa

    Google's geocoding quality was another big gripe in my area (http://is.gd/1bKj), though they've made huge progress on that issue lately: http://is.gd/1bKr

     
  • At August 1, 2008 12:55 PM , Blogger Scott Bliss said...

    This post has been removed by the author.

     
  • At August 1, 2008 12:56 PM , Blogger Scott Bliss said...

    William: don't worry about Steve -- we went to college together and he couldn't install a lightbulb.

    Amen on Google's aging map data. But I wonder if the errors are their fault...Every time I give my out-of-town friends my address, I always have to tell them to turn right at the stop sign and not pay attention to Google, Mapquest, or Live Maps because they all say to turn left.

    Is one more of an authoritative source than the other?

    Also, I'm interested to hear about your Mapping the Bubble project. I've been trying to do something like that for my area, but I'm not sure the best way to crack our local real estate database. Sure, I can manually enter data and create a custom map of home sales, but I wish I had some sort of interface.

    If you look at my post from yesterday, I give a link to my county's real estate site. Any ideas?

    Thanks for reading,
    Scott

     
  • At August 1, 2008 11:31 PM , Anonymous John said...

    Something I am liking is the Traffic maps on Google Maps. Though a drawback...There have been plenty of times when my roommate would call me asking for best routing from DC through Baltimore when he would go home to Jersey.

     
  • At August 2, 2008 8:54 AM , Blogger Scott Bliss said...

    Microsoft Live Maps also has functionality to allow you to choose a route based on traffic.

    However, without a free mobile application, traffic updates are virtually useless on long trips.

    I'm excited to see a car that you can plug your mobile phone into so you can have a nice hands-free way of avoiding traffic. My 2007 Civic has voice recognition, which works with the built-in GPS.

    How cool would that be if I could plug in my phone (or sync with bluetooth) when I got in the car and be able to access LIVE information from the internet about where I'm heading? It could include traffic data, restaurant data, and weather.

    I bet we see it within three years.

     
  • At August 4, 2008 10:40 AM , Anonymous William M. Hartnett said...

    @scott: Depending on the freedom of information laws in your state, you might be able to file a public records request for home sales data with the local government agency that records the transactions. Here in Florida, that would be the county property appraiser offices, which are obligated under our "sunshine" laws to provide such data at very low cost, often even for free.

     

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home